Feminismo transnacional y comunidades afectivas como resistencia frente al tecnopatriarcado: la instapoesía de Nikita Gill y Monika Radojevic

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14198/fem.30891

Palabras clave:

tecnopatriarcado, literatura transnacional, identidad transnacional, feminismo transnacional, estudios literarios feministas, lectura analítica feminista, instapoesía, comunidad afectiva, Nikita Gill, Monika Radojevic

Resumen

El presente artículo se propone articular una aproximación feminista al concepto de comunidad que se distancie de los modelos comunitarios patriarcales para converger hacia las genealogías feministas, la ética del cuidado y las comunidades afectivas. El estudio entabla un diálogo crítico con las teorías de la comunidad de Jean-Luc Nancy y Maurice Blanchot, atendiendo específicamente a sus formulaciones sobre las comunidades operativas, inoperantes e inconfesables. Posteriormente, la investigación transita hacia una propuesta de construcción comunitaria feminista fundamentada en los conceptos de vulnerabilidad, afecto y solidaridad feminista transnacional, nutriéndose de las genealogías de académicas como Chandra Talpade Mohanty y Monica Rogowska-Stangret. Se presentan las Comunidades Afectivas Feministas como un modelo comunitario que promueve el respeto por la alteridad, los conocimientos y respuestas situados, y la conciencia sobre la opresión –especialmente en razón de género– y sus intersecciones con otras formas de subordinación. Este modelo reivindica la conciencia de un colectivo que trasciende lo individual y apuesta por alianzas voluntarias, arraigadas en el afecto, con la voluntad y capacidad de propiciar transformaciones sociales. Dichas alianzas transnacionales resultan imperativas frente al tecnopatriarcado y proveen vínculos necesarios en un mundo globalizado. Asimismo, se examina la relevancia y el contexto del «giro transnacional» en los estudios literarios y su vinculación con la recepción de la instapoesía. Mediante una metodología de lectura analítica feminista (feminist close-reading), las autoras demuestran cómo las Comunidades Afectivas Feministas se materializan en las interacciones entre autoría, texto y público lector dentro de un entorno digital y transnacional. Finalmente, se analizan los casos de estudio de dos poetas transnacionales, Nikita Gill y Monika Radojevic, para evidenciar cómo la teoría de las Comunidades Afectivas Feministas fundamenta una lectura crítica de la instapoesía y cómo estas comunidades son mediadas por las formas literarias y las respuestas afectivas.

Financiación

This research was supported by the 101073012 EUTERPE HORIZONMSCA-2021-DN-01 Project. EUTERPE: European Literatures and Gender from a Transnational Perspective is a European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement. The research has been funded by this project. The EUTERPE Project is led by Jasmina Lukic at the Central European University, Vienna. Adelina Sánchez-Espinosa is the Principal Investigator at the University of Granada.

Citas

Bassett, C., Kember, S., & O'Riordan, K. (2020). Furious: Technological Feminism and Digital Futures. Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvs09qqf

Braidotti, R. (2008). The Politics of Life as Bios/Zoe. In A. Smelik & N. Lykke (Eds.), Bits of Life. Feminism at the Intersections of Media, Bioscience and Technology (pp. 198-213). University of Washington Press.

Chillón, A. (2014). La palabra facticia. Universitat de València.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (R. Hurley, M. Seem & H. R. Lane, Trans.). Continuum. (Original published in 1972).

Faulkner, S. L. (2018). Crank up the Feminism: Poetic Inquiry as Feminist Methodology. Humanities, 7(3), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/h7030085

Federici, E., & Fortunati, V. (2019). Theorizing Women's Transnational Literatures: Shaping New Female Identities in Europe through Writing and Translation. In J. Lukic, S. Forrester & B. Faragó (Eds.), Times of Mobility: Transnational Literature and Gender in Translation (pp. 47-78.). Central European University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789633863305-005

Fernández Hoyos, S., & Sanchez-Espinosa, A. (2019). Zygmunt Bauman's Liquidity and Transnational Women's Literature Nancy Huston and Assia Djebar as Case Studies. In J. Lukic, S. Forrester & B. Faragó (Eds.), Times of Mobility: Transnational Literature and Gender in Translation (pp. 95-115). Central European University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789633863305-007

Genette, G. (1997). Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. The University of Cambridge.

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Gill, N. [nikita_gill]. (2023, May 15). «Did you say no? Really? Were you loud enough? Did you scream? Did you really say no clearly enough though?» [Photograph]. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/p/CsRFmUuMUgv/?hl=en.

Grewal, I., & Kaplan, C. (1994). Introduction: Transnational Feminist Practices and Questions of Postmodernity. In I. Grewal & C. Kaplan (Eds.), Scattered Hegemonies (pp. 1-33). University of Minnesota Press.

Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question. Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066

Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the Trouble. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11cw25q

Hayles, N. K. (2004). Print Is Flat, Code Is Deep: The Importance of Media-Specific Analysis. Poetics Today, 25(1), 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-25-1-67

Hester, H. (2018). Xenofeminism. Polity Press.

Horne, O. (2024, May 6). Poet Nikita Gill on identity, mythology and the power of oral tradition. Roadbook. https://roadbook.com/london/people/nikita-gill-poet-interview/

Jay, P. (2021). Transnational Literature: The Basics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429286667

Keller, U., & Rakusa, I. (2004). Writing Europe: What Is European About the Literatures of Europe?: Essays from 33 European Countries. CEU Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003723929

Kiernan, A. (2021). Writing Cultures and Literary Media: Publishing and Reception in the Digital Age. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75081-7

Knox, J. (2024). 'Real' Reel Poetry: Examining Co-Digital Motherhood Communities Through Reel Instapoetry. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 30(1-2), 59-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2024.2369516

Knox, J., & Mackay, J. (2024). Introduction. In J. Mackay & J. Knox (Eds.), Reading #Instapoetry. A Poetics of Instagram (pp. 1-14.). Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798765105511.ch-I

Laboria Cuboniks. (2018). The Xenofeminist Manifesto. Verso.

Lorde, A. (1984). Sister Outsider. Crossing Press.

Lukic, J., Forrester, S., & Faragó, B. (2019). Introduction: Transnational Literatures and Cultures in/and Translation. In J. Lukic, S. Forrester & B. Faragó (Eds.), Times of Mobility: Transnational Literature and Gender in Translation (pp. 1-16). Central European University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789633863305-003

Lukic, J., & Sánchez-Espinosa, A. (2011). Feminist Approaches to Close Reading. In R. Buikema, G. Gabriele Griffin & N. Lykke (Eds.), Theories and Methodologies in Postgraduate Feminist Research. Researching Differently (pp. 105-118). Routledge.

Matthews, K. L. (2019). 'Woke' and Reading: Social Media, Reception, and Contemporary Black Feminism. Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 1(16), 390-411.

Miller, A (2021). A Digital Revolution? Insiders, Outsiders, and the «Disruptive Potential» of Instapoetry. arcadia, 56(2),161-182. https://doi.org/10.1515/arcadia-2021-9029

Mirzoeff, N. (2011). The Right to Look: A Counterhistory of Visuality. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822393726

Mohanty, C. (2025). Insurgent Visions: Feminism, Justice, Solidarity. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/book.138695

Penke, N. (2023). Instapoetry: Digital Image Texts. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66834-4

Plant, S. (1997). Zeros + Ones: Digital Women and the New Technoculture. Doubleday.

Radojevic, M. [monikaradojevic]. (2022, January 16). In this society, dating a man who weaponises his incompetence is a rite of passage. … #weaponisedincompetence #incompetent #sexism #everydaysexism. [Photograph]. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/p/CYyYpXgImnM/?hl=en&img_index=2

Radojevic, M. [monikaradojevic]. (2023, January 12). Bringing back an old favourite . [Photograph]. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/p/CnT8OFoow2c/?hl=en&img_index=5

Revelles-Benavente, B. (2021). Intra-Mat-Extuality: Feminist Resilience within Contemporary Literature. European Journal of English Studies, 25(2), 190-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2021.1949852

Revelles-Benavente, B. (2025). Feminist Literature as Everyday Use: New Materialist Methodologies for Critical Thinking. Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350425347

Revelles-Benavente, B., & González Ramos, A.M. (2017). Teaching Gender: Feminist Pedagogy and Responsibility in Times of Political Crisis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204161

Revelles-Benavente, B., & Sánchez-Espinosa, A. (2024). Feminist Literary and Filmic Cultures for Social Action: Gender Response-able Labs. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032616797

Rodríguez-Salas, G. (2013). «Two Grinning Puppets Jigging Away in Nothingness»: Symbolism and the Community of Lovers in Katherine Mansfield's Short Fiction. In P. Martín Salván, G. Gerardo Rodríguez-Salas & J. Jiménez Heffernan (Eds.), Community in Twentieth-Century Fiction (pp. 67-83). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137282842_3

Rodríguez-Salas, G., Martín Salván, P., & López, M. J. (2018). Introduction: Who's Afraid of the Modernist Community? In G. Rodríguez-Salas, P. Martín Salvan & M.J. López (Eds.), New Perspectives on Community and the Modernist Subject (pp. 1-20). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351251860-1

Rogowska-Strangret, M. (2017). Sharing Vulnerabilities. Searching for «Unruly Edges» in Times of the Neoliberal Academy. In B. Revelles-Benavente & A.M. González Ramos (Eds.), Teaching Gender: Feminist Pedagogy and Responsibility in Times of Political Crisis (pp.11-24). Routledge.

Rosenblatt, L. (1978). The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transaction Theory of Literary Work. Southern Illinois University Press.

Sánchez-Espinosa, A., & Méndez de la Brena, D. E. (2022). Feminist Research Alliances: Affective convergences. Researching with GEMMA series (Vol. 1). Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b17229

Seyhan, A. (2001). Writing Outside the Nation. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400823994

Smallman, E. (2022, August 10). Poet Nikita Gill: 'I worry about people getting tattoos of my work. What if I made a typo?' The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2022/aug/10/poet-nikita-gill-i-worry-about-people-getting-tattoos-of-my-work-what-if-i-made-a-typo

Syrdal, K. (2022, March 4). Nikita Gill, The Poetry Queen of Instagram. Collective World. https://collective.world/nikita-gill/

Tridimas, B. (2021, April 28). The poet and #Merky books winner uplifting a generation. Huck. https://www.huckmag.com/article/the-poet-merky-books-winner-uplifting-a-generation

Villar-Argáiz, P. (2013). Organic and Unworked Communities in James Joyce's «The Dead». In P. Martín Salván, G. Gerardo Rodríguez-Salas & J. Jiménez Heffernan (Eds.), Community in Twentieth-Century Fiction (pp. 48-66). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137282842_2

Wacjman, J. (2006). TechnoFeminism. Polity Press.

Widdowson, P. (1999). Literature. Routledge.

Wodak, R. (2015). The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270073

Descargas

Publicado

02-07-2026

Cómo citar

O'Kane, S., & Sánchez-Espinosa, A. (2026). Feminismo transnacional y comunidades afectivas como resistencia frente al tecnopatriarcado: la instapoesía de Nikita Gill y Monika Radojevic. Feminismo/s, (48), 235–263. https://doi.org/10.14198/fem.30891