Feminismo/s

Bacchi as pedagogy: Surfacing equality and human rights in public policy teaching

Angela O’Hagan

Abstract

Understanding the structural dimensions of inequality, and reflecting on our own assumptions and the presuppositions and knowledge basis of the institutions we work in is key to a critical approach to management and to learning. That is the central argument of this article which demonstrates the application of Bacchi’s ‘What’s the Problem Represented to be?’ framework in the learning, teaching and assessment in a post graduate programme on Citizenship and Human Rights. Based on critical theories in feminism, disability, racism, globalisation and human rights, the programme aimed to support «practitioner students» in acquiring new theoretical knowledge and applying that to their organisational practice. Reflecting on current practice and procedures and thinking backwards from current ways of thinking and doing, students were encouraged to «critically engage in thinking otherwise», as exhorted by Bacchi. Through this critical engagement with theory and practice, student practitioners could then «surface» the equalities and human rights dimensions and tensions in their work.

Keywords

Equality; Human rights; Public policy; Social justice; Feminism

References

Bacchi, Carol Lee. Women, policy and politics: The construction of policy problems. London: Sage, 1999.

Bacchi, Carol. «Policy, theory, politics: Problem representations in drug and gambling policy.» International Summer School on Inequality and Addictive. 2006. http://hdl. handle. net/2440/57267.

Bacchi, Carol Lee. «The Issue of Intentionality in Frame Theory: The Need for Reflexive Framing». In The Discursive Politics of Gender Equality: Stretching, Bending and Policymaking. Eds. Emanuela Lombardo, Petra Meier & Mieke Verloo (eds.). London: Routledge. 2009. 19-36.

Bacchi, Carol. «Why study problematizations? Making politics visible.» Open journal of political science 2.01 (2012): 1. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2012.21001

Bacchi, Carol, and Susan Goodwin. Poststructural Policy Analysis: A Guide to Practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52546-8

Bagilhole, Barbara. Understanding equal opportunities and diversity: the social differentiations and intersections of inequality. Bristol: The Policy Press, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t89d53

Beasley, Chris, and Angelique Bletsas. Engaging with Carol Bacchi. Strategic interventions and exchanges. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press, 2012.

Bjørnholt, Margunn, and Ailsa McKay, eds. Counting on Marilyn Waring: New advances in feminist economics. Bradford, ON: Demeter Press, 2014.

Bradley, Harriet. Gender. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013.

Burchardt, Tania, and Polly Vizard. «‘Operationalizing’ the capability approach as a basis for equality and human rights monitoring in twenty‐first‐century Britain.» Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 12.1 (2011): 91-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2011.541790

Coles, Emma, Helen Cheyne, Jean Rankin, and Brigid Daniel. «Getting It Right for Every Child: A National Policy Framework to Promote Children’s Well‐being in Scotland, United Kingdom.» The Milbank Quarterly 94. 2 (2016): 334-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12195

Conley, H. «Gender equality in the UK: Is reflexive and responsive legislation the way forward?». In Gender and Diversity Studies in European Perspectives. Eds. Ingrid Jungwirth & Carole Bauschke-Urban. Verlag Barbara Budrich. 2016.

Fineman, Martha Albertson. «The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition». Yale Journal of Law & Feminism 20.1 (2008): 1-23.

Folbre, Nancy. Who pays for the kids?: Gender and the structures of constraint. London/ New York: Routledge, 1994. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203168295

Foster, Richard H., Mark K. McBeth & Randy S. Clemons. «Public Policy Pedagogy: Mixing Methodologies Using Cases». Journal of Public Affairs Education, 16.4 (2010): 517-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2010.12001613

Hepple, Bob. Equality: The legal framework. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014.

Hibbert, Paul. «Approaching reflexivity through reflection: Issues for critical management education». Journal of Management Education 37.6 (2013): 803-827. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562912467757

Lombardo, Emanuela, Petra Meier, and Mieke Verloo (eds.). The discursive politics of gender equality. London: Routledge, 2009. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203881330

Nussbaum, Martha. «Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice». Feminist Economics 9. 2-3 (2003): 33-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570022000077926

O’Hagan, Angela. «Perspectives on gender equality in Scotland.» In Poverty in Scotland: The Independence Referendum and Beyond. Edinburgh: Child Poverty Action Group, 2014. 229-235.

O’Hagan, Angela. «Favourable Conditions for the Adoption and Implementation of Gender Budgeting: Insights from Comparative Analysis». Politica Economica/Journal of Economic Policy (PEJEP) XXXI. 2 (2015): 233-252.

Rees, Teresa. «Mainstreaming equality» in Engendering Social Policy. Buckingham: Open University Press. 1999.

Scott, Gill, and Gerry Mooney. «Poverty and social justice in the devolved Scotland: neoliberalism meets social democracy?». Social Policy and Society 8.3 (2009): 379-389. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746409004916

Sen, Amartya. «Equality of what?». In Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Ed. Sterling McMurrin. Vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1980.

Sen, Amartya. Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992. Squires, Judith. The new politics of gender equality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.

Squires, Judith. The new politics of gender equality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-03653-7




DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/fem.2020.35.08





Copyright (c) 2020 Angela O’Hagan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.