Antifeminist Fallacies

Luciana Samamé

Abstract

The specific objective of this work is to identify and dismantle certain fallacious arguments usually used to attack feminism. These arguments circulate both in academic and intellectual media, as well as in mass media. The importance of this task is twofold, since it would contribute to the fulfillment of two more general objectives: on the one hand, to dismantle those misguided criticisms that, far from strengthening the debate within feminism, obscure and hinder it; on the other, to make visible the importance and present relevance of feminism. The methodology used is analytical-philosophical, and consists basically of the logical analysis of concepts and arguments.

Keywords

Feminism; Justice; Fallacies

References

Aristóteles. Política. Madrid: Gredos, 1988. (Traducción de Manuela García Valdés)

Butler, Judith. El género en disputa. El feminismo y la subversión de la identidad. Barcelona: Paidós, 2007.

Comesaña, Juan. Lógica informal, falacias y argumentos filosóficos. Buenos Aires: Eudeba, 2001.

Copi, Irving, y Carl Cohen. Introducción a la lógica. México: Limusa, 2007.

Costa, M. Victoria. «The Indeterminacy of Rawls’s Principles of Justice for Women’s Freedom from Domination». John Rawls: Debating the Major Questions. Eds. Sarah Roberts-Cady and Jon Mandle. Oxford: Oxford University Press. En prensa.

Deigh, John. «Empathy, Justice and Jurisprudence». The Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (2011): 73-90.

Franulic Depix, Andrea. «Por un análisis feminista del discurso desde la diferencia sexual». Revista ALED 15. 1 (2015): 7-22.

Maffía, Diana. «Epistemología feminista: La subversión semiótica de las mujeres en la ciencia». Revista venezolana de estudios de la mujer 12. 28 (2007): 63-98.

Maffia, Diana, y Mauro Cabral. «Los sexos ¿son o se hacen?». Sexualidades migrantes. Género y transgénero. Comp. Diana Maffía. Buenos Aires: Feminaria, 2003. 86-96.

Moller Oskin, Susan. Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books Publishers, 1989.

Moore, George Edward. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1903.

Nelson, Mark. «Is/Ought Fallacy». Bad Arguments. 100 of the most important fallacies in Western Philosophy. Eds. Robert Arp, Steven Barbone, Michael Bruce. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2019. 360-363.

Nussbaum, Martha. Women and Human Development. The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Nussbaum, Martha. Frontiers of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2006.

Oseguera Gamba, Jorge. La falacia naturalista. Diss. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2012.

Pujal, Margot. El feminismo. Barcelona: Editorial UOC, 2015.

Rachels, James. Introducción a la Filosofía Moral. México: FCE, 2007.

Roberts, Robert. «Justice as an emotion disposition». On emotions. Ed. John Deigh. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. 14-28.

Salles, Arleen. «Percepción y Emociones en la Moralidad». Isegoría. Revista de Filosofía Moral y Política 20 (1999): 217-226.

Schopenhauer, Arthur. «Sobre el fundamento de la moral». Los dos problemas fundamentales de la Ética. Madrid: Siglo XXI, 2002. (Traducción de Pilar López de Santamaría).

Shklar, Judith. The faces of injustice. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990.

Solomon, Robert. «Sympathy and Vengeance: The Role of Feelings in Justice». In Defense of Sentimentality (The Passionate Life). Ed. Robert Solomon. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. 20-42.

Scalambrino, Frank. «Reductio ad Hitlerum». Bad Arguments. 100 of the most important fallacies in Western Philosophy. Eds. Robert Arp, Steven Barbone, Michael Bruce. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2019. 212-214.

Violi, Patrizia. El infinito singular. Madrid: Cátedra, 1991.

Wrisley, George. «Appeal to emotion: force or fear». Bad Arguments. 100 of the most important fallacies in Western Philosophy. Eds. Robert Arp, Steven Barbone, Michael Bruce. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2019. 98-101.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/fem.2019.34.14





Copyright (c) 2019 Luciana Samamé

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.